Snap to Point can be on, if you like being able to snap editing to existing anchor points. Then, under the View menu, ensure Snap to Pixel is off, and Snap to Grid is on. I use 512, but this could be 1, or 1000, or whatever youвЂ™d like, as long as theyвЂ™re both the same. To set up a grid that matches the pixel grid, open Guides & Grids in Preferences, and ensure the вЂњGridline everyвЂќ and вЂњSubdivisionsвЂќ are the same value. Thankfully, IllustratorвЂ™s grid feature does provide the behaviour IвЂ™m after. That makes the behaviour very unpredictable in practice. And, what happens with fractional stroke widths? The snapping behaviour is different for a 2.4px stroke compared to a 2.5px stroke. For the behaviour I want, I would need to ensure IвЂ™m always creating or editing paths with no stroke, or an even width stroke in advance.

This means style and snapping behaviour are linked, which is bad. I understand why this decision was made, but I strongly disagree with it. If you have a 1px stroke, drawing and editing snaps to the center of a pixel, not the boundary of a pixel. It also takes into consideration the current stroke width, to ensure the entire object fits snuggly against the pixel boundaries. However, that isnвЂ™t what the pixel snapping option in Illustrator does. The behaviour I want is fairly simple - every time I create an object, or move a point, or edit a bГ©zier control handle, I want that action to snap to the nearest pixel boundary. The Illustrator defaults arenвЂ™t to my liking, and counter-intuitively, the pixel snapping feature isnвЂ™t what I use to pixel snap. Illustrator is a complex tool, and without the right settings, itвЂ™s impossible to work efficiently. My Illustrator snapping settings IвЂ™m frequently asked about my Illustrator settings, specifically in relation to snapping and icon speedrunnning.

Draftsight 2018 turn off snap to image